Hey guys, long time, no post. I've got a question for ya'll. I remember reading a blog entry several months ago wherein the author stated that when calibrating a CGM, you might be tempted to do it more frequently than indicated, but that actually is a not-so-great idea, due to some scientific stuff that escapes me at the moment. It was one of those things where it seems like more is better, like if you calibrate it more frequently, then you are improving the accuracy, but in fact the opposite was true. Does this ring a bell with any of ya'll? If so, can you drop me a link in the comments? Thanks.
I've been out of the blogging loop for a while, but thanks to the recent Diabetes Blog Week, I've been doing a bit more reading and commenting. Now I just need to get back to posting. We've got our local JDRF walk coming up next weekend, so look forward to a thrilling recap some time thereafter.
I think it was Wendy from Candy Hearts. I would go search under the label "Dexcom".
ReplyDeleteI was going to say the same thing as Reyna. I'm fairly certain it was Wendy from Candy Hearts. :)
ReplyDeleteah thanks ladies, you're both right. here it is, for reference: http://www.candyheartsblog.com/2011/02/dexcom-review-2-months-into-game.html
ReplyDeleteI too was tempted to update all the time thinking it made logical sense. But it usually backfires and now we try for only twice a day. Love your blog!
ReplyDeleteAw, thanks Kelly! I dig yours too! :)
ReplyDelete